Compare And Contrast Three Authors Say About Nature Of “technology`

Author NameCourse NameGuide NameMarch 9 , 2008Technology : Nature and Effects on anatomical reference mental synthesis and Behavior of OrganizationsIntroductionThe ever-changing nature of utilize science has induced m all a(prenominal) studies on the semblance between engine room and placement or faceal anatomical coordinate to be much specific . As plan evolves from one aim of sophistication to a high seize on , it is obvious that the entire gamut of production from design , equipment , procedures , operators , supplies and actual to the milieu undergoes changes . It to a fault follows naturally that such(prenominal) wide-ranging changes ar startle to be reflected in the brass structure also . The disbelief here is - to what extent does engine room affect or square up institution structure ? The three studi es under precondition take radically different stands on the issue . bit `The prudence of Innovation by burn Stalker (1961 ) asserts that changing applied science and securities industry place conditions define the management system of some(prenominal) disposal , `The Measurement of Organization Structures by DS Pugh (1973 ) states that technology by itself has a very marginal effect on the structure of organizations , especially manufacturing organizations , merely combines with new(prenominal) contextual dimensions such as surface , to exert a telling mildew on the organization structure Charles Perrow (1984 /1999 ) in `Normal Accidents , active with high-risk Technologies , on the other hand , contends that the present level of sophistication and complexities in technologies confirm led to a pip in which organization structures , however developed or fit they may be to the changing technological situations , are otiose to cope with or handle systems with `inte ractive complexities and tight couplingIn m! any another(prenominal) ways , Burns Stalker and Perrow assume that management has a very minimal role to antic in the organisation of organization structure Burns Stalker implies that technology and market conditions or the changes in them almost instinctively determine the structure of organizations i .e . organization structure changes in response to changes in technical and market situations .

Perrow takes control proscribed of the hands of domain and management in situations that are the result of the intricacies of technology and unexplainable to the intellect of mankind beings . Pugh however attri savees senior m anagement with free lance energy to alter the structure of an organization by as frequently as the combined effects of all other contextual dimensions of the organization itselfBurns Stalker and Perrow describe extreme situations . Pugh adopts a more rational and holistic approach . All organizations impart be affected by technology and the changes in technology , but technology by itself could hardly lead to spontaneous moldable organization structure . It is management that will have to actualize the technology , its changes and the related implications and mould the organization to resolve and hold effectively to changing environments . The human management calculate has to play a decisive and deliberate role in specify and implementing different kinds of organization structure for different types of technology situations taking into consideration not only the technological position but also all other factors that could affect the organization structureThe best or id eal organization structure for any technology situati! on could in all possibilities not be the monetary standard or...If you want to get a full essay, set out it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper