This assignment is on the pros and cons of the majority rules system in Australia.

legal age Rules Verdict A. Outline the minds that start take to the woods to this law being changed. The pop out Rules Verdict is in establish in a smattering of states in Australia. The main savvys for ever-changing the standard laws for jury Verdicts to Majority Rules, is that it is very expensive to encumber 12 jurors penned up in a hotel for a hardly a(prenominal) age to even weeks, wholly because ace person refuses to tally with the stick. Another important reason is that the Majority Rules Verdict is little time consuming and result allow for more cases to be heard. Also it is important that the jurors contribute get back to their prevalent lives, instead of days penned up in a hotel close to a case. B.Discuss the effects (both constructive and negative) this law change will have on the community POSITIVE - superstar reason is to minimise the number of juries that hang. If your jury hangs, you feel you have superfluous the courts time; gaunt money an d more signifi give noticetly wasted your own time. - Cases involving hung juries dont have to take many days to break up the problems. Thus, cases can be heard and a finding of position can be a lot quicker if bulk rules verdict is used. - Majority rules verdict overcomes the problem of the rogue or perverse juror who refuses to listen to the other jurors or the evidence.

prohibit -In idealistic circumstances, someone may be wrongly sentenced because of the bulk rules verdict. Where the one person against the jury could have actually convince the rest of the jury. -It upholds the requirement of proof beyond sensible doubt. Allowing a juror to dissent ! from a verdict of guilty operator that at least one juror had a reasonable doubt, which can create uncertainty in the conviction. C. Write a letter... If you indispensableness to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper