Homosexuality as a Theological Issue Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Homosexuality as a Theological Issue - Essay ExampleChristians set themselves at the center of this wave, as people look up to them for guidance on the dead end they atomic number 18 supposed to take. The commonality of this in theology particularly, is that people need to know Christians stand in this homosexualism turn off. As much(prenominal), different theologians have written different articles expressing their ideas on the homosexuality as a social wall plug. In my analysis in this essay, I will put into consideration three authors writings, and their logical thinking about homosexuality. A concise summary of each of these theological reasoning will form the basis of their comparison and contrast. Conclusively, I will draw personalized ideas and thoughts on the homosexuality issue. Koranteng-Pipim, in his article, Three Conflicting Views on Homosexuality seeks to find the churchs stand on homosexuality. The biggest issue is whether they should accept or reject these ind ividuals whenever they join their congregation. Both stands have their unique ethical consequences. However, he singles out the case of seventh day adventurist church, which has assumed three approaches to homosexuality (Koranteng-Pipim 1). Despite the locating that the church in past has assumed a non-acceptance stand on this issue, the recent rise of pro-homosexual groups keep on to amount the church on assuming a full-acceptance approach to these people. However, he notes that some segments within contemporaneous Adventism are moving towards the qualified-acceptance view in addressing homosexuality. Koranteng-Pipim argues that although these other views have emerged, the non-acceptance view remains the official position of the Seventh-day Adventist church (Koranteng-Pipim 2). Different tenets support these divergence views. The basic tenets in support of these views include the nature of homosexuality, worship of homosexuality, way out of homosexuality and response to homose xuality. The non-acceptance view holds that homosexuality is a distortion of human sexuality, it is pixilated and sinful, and that God has the capability of changing any situation (Koranteng-Pipim 6). In their arguments though, those advocating for full acceptance have to support to being born again and thus fully assimilated in the church. In his article, Homosexuality and Christian credence A Theological Reflection Jennings points out that homosexuals and homosexuality is one of the major importance deliberations of denominational bodies. This issue has drawn different feelings among the proponents and opponents of homosexuality issue. On one side are the supporters of the traditional sexuality part on the other hand is the group in support of the emerging trends in sexuality (Jennings 137). However, he observes that theological reflection has conspicuously been missing from this conservative-liberal confrontation. He observes that people hold many biases in the issue of homos exuality in the society. He however does not propose a theology of homosexuality, but proposes how complete principles of Christian theology illuminate this question or complex of issues. He looks at different principles of theology, such as one by Karl Barth, which proposes that that Christian faith goes along with the charitable God, who is the Supreme Being (Jennings 137). The supreme intention is to justify, save and redeem humanity, but not on the basis of a discrimination between better and worse persons but solely on the basis of Gods own gracious election. He argues that in case of a violation of this theological principle, it places in human hands the power to implement our own salvation. The second principle as he points out is the universality